Clinton-era FDA action still keeps women in danger from abortion pills
The only way the FDA could have approved these pills was to characterize pregnancy as an “illness” and argue that these deadly drugs provide a “meaningful therapeutic benefit.”
Powerful commentary on the latest cultural trends and issues regarding abortion, euthanasia and more!
The only way the FDA could have approved these pills was to characterize pregnancy as an “illness” and argue that these deadly drugs provide a “meaningful therapeutic benefit.”
The prevailing view is that abortion is needed for women to be successful. This is, in an ironic turn of events, internalized misogyny on the part of pro-choice women.
It’s conceivable that you could choose to save fewer people in a given circumstance, even if you consider them all equally valuable.