However, when pro-life advocates are able to answer even the toughest or vilest challenges with grace and clarity, those who are “on the fence” regarding abortion are left with something to think about.

Abortion is often framed as a form of compassion, preventing children from ever experiencing bullying, discrimination, poverty, or others forms of suffering. This line of thinking only makes sense if one starts with the presumption that the preborn are not fully human as the born are.

Does the Bible's description of God breathing life into Adam mean we cannot be sure when human life begins, like Pete Buttigieg says?

War films like 1917 have a habit of confronting our moral complacency and our cynical apathy by bringing to light the character traits which make or break great men and women in promoting good or tolerating evil.

A forthcoming film for the Sundance Film Festival is hoping to spur dialogue on abortion among filmmakers and viewers. Titled Never Rarely Sometimes Always, the movie follows two teenage girls who are pregnant and seeking abortion.

This study is not the most helpful tool for determining the true motivations for pro-lifers. However, for the sake of argument, let’s suppose it’s true: pro-lifers (including the women in the movement) are all evil, nasty, misogynistic jerks. So what?

The “Right to Refuse” argument is by far one of the strongest arguments for abortion rights. If one wanted to ground abortion as a natural right of women this is a good place to start. I happen to think it is one of the best arguments put forward in favor of abortion.

Bodily autonomy: This is probably the best argument for the basis of abortion rights, and poses a serious challenge for the pro-life advocate.

It has become fashionable in recent times for abortion choice advocates to make a series of accusations, assertions, and quasi-arguments in response to pro-life efforts in order to dismiss pro-life claims about the immorality of abortion.

The pro-abortion movement incessently claims that pro-lifers only care about babies before they’re born. Lies? We think so.

Rep. Rogers angrily denounced the pro-life movement with one of the most shockingly honest admissions by a pro-abortion advocate. Here is where he missed the mark.

The objections from pro-choice critics of the March for Life simply fail to give a good reason to reject the pro-life position as “unscientific” and immoral.

Attempting to normalize abortion in American society, the new Kids Meet video actually does a better job of normalizing bad arguments for abortion.

How should a civil society treat human beings who do not measure up to our culture’s standard of who is valuable?

A recent article by Presbyterian Pastor Tim Keller calling for an openness to both American political parties by American Christians has gained a lot of attention. Here's where it misses the mark.

Are Christians hyprocrites by standing for the preborn but ignoring other social issues?

A timely new book by Laura Hughes brings hope to a culture currently filled with despair and hatred.

“There is no scientific support for the pro-life position on abortion,” or so say some of our critics.

In order to be an effective advocate for the preborn, it is necessary to gain an understanding of how to answer claims correctly and persuasively. Here are 6 books that will teach you just that!